Thumbing a Nose at Indian Poverty? Antilia's Billion-Dollar House in Pictures

Few buildings on earth provoke the argument that Antilia does. Mukesh Ambani's 27-storey residence in South Mumbai — valued at around a billion dollars, with its ballroom, spa, theatre, terrace gardens, and multi-storey garage — rises over a city where millions live in slums. The contrast is the whole argument, and it has been running since the house was completed.
The critics' case is simple: in a country with India's poverty, a private skyscraper for one family is not merely extravagant but morally indefensible — a thumbing of the nose at the poor, built as a monument to wealth in the middle of need.
The defenders' case is equally simple: it is private money, legally earned, on which taxes were paid. A billionaire's house employs hundreds of people — staff, maintenance, security — and the alternative, critics of the critics note, is not that the money would have been spent on poverty alleviation; it would have been spent on something else private.
Both sides have a point, which is why the debate never ends. Antilia is not really about architecture. It is about what extreme wealth means in a poor country — whether the visibility of it is itself an injury, or whether the injury is in begrudging someone their own earnings.
The photographs will keep circulating. So will the argument.
For the story of the family's own first look inside, see our earlier piece on Nita Ambani's Vanity Fair interview.
Related Stories

Inside Antilia: Nita Ambani Finally Opens the Doors
After years of speculation, Nita Ambani gave Vanity Fair its first look inside Antilia in 2012 — and settled the rumors about whether the family had ever

World's Most Expensive House: Ambani's Antilia in Mumbai Lies Vacant
Mukesh Ambani's 27-storey Antilia was called the world's most expensive home — and sat empty amid reports its owners feared bad luck. Inside the 2011 story.
Indian Education System: Producing Engineers, Losing Thinkers
India's exam machine sorts brilliantly, thinks poorly: millions of engineers following algorithms, few who question them. Why the incentives make reform hard.